” Het is vooral zaak de prijzen goed in de gaten te houden…”

 

 

Description:
Since the global financial crisis of 2008, the major governments of the world have resorted to printing vast sums of money to pay national debts and bail out banks. The warning signs are clear, and the collapse of the Zimbabwean dollar in 2009 after years of rampant money printing is a frightening example of what lies in store for the world’s economies if painful, but necessary, reform is not enacted soon. When Money Destroys Nations tells the gripping story of the disintegration of the once-thriving Zimbabwean economy and how ordinary people survived in turbulent circumstances.
Analysing this case within a global context, Philip Haslam and Russell Lamberti investigate the causes of hyperinflation and draw ominous parallels between Zimbabwe and the world’s developed economies. The looming currency crises and possible hyperinflation in these major economies, particularly the United States, have the potential to turn the current world order upside down. Zimbabwe’s lessons must not be ignored. This is the story of When Money Destroys Nations.

 *

Geredigeerde citaten uit When Money Destroys Nations.

Hyperinflation, simply explained, is extreme price inflation. Often referred to just as ‘inflation’, price inflation is a general increase in prices in the economy. Hyperinflation is essentially a period of economic chaos when confidence in the currency deteriorates markedly, leading to a rapid, chaotic and uncontrollable rise in the prices of goods and services, and the eventual collapse of confidence in the currency.

In formal academic literature, many economists try to pinpoint the rate of inflation that reveals when a country has definitively entered hyperinflation, but opinions vary wildly, from 100% to 12 874% per year.32 The specific thresholds are arbitrary and misleading. Practically speaking, hyperinflation isn’t a measured rate. It is a set of cultural states.

As a field for economic study, it is better to look at the critical qualitative changes in an economy, rather than randomly selected quantitative thresholds. These cultural changes are much more nuanced and yet have much better usefulness in describing the path of hyperinflation and analysing those countries that have gone down this path. Hence, this study has focused far more on these qualitative aspects of hyperinflation.

In fact, hyperinflation is never a moment. It is a collection of many critical points – a process. And while it has to do with prices rising, it is really the dramatic process of an established currency losing its usefulness as money.

Each stage of this process inflicts pain on the lives of communities in unique and debilitating ways, which together combine to form the dramatic process of hyperinflation.  ………….

However, to understand hyperinflation, one needs to understand inflation first. And to understand inflation, one needs to understand prices.
Prices are crucial signals. They direct all economic activity, coordinating the actions of millions of buyers, sellers and producers. Almost everything you possess or use is associated with a price: your salary, the food you eat, the place you live in. Interest rates and stock market values are prices.
Anything traded between a buyer and seller has a price. Even free stuff has a price – someone had to pay for it!

Money printing gives government great power.
Both those who control money printing and those who receive that money first are in a powerful position. If an unrestrained government decides to use its money printing privilege as a way to pay for its expenses, it can spend with limited direct accountability. It can manipulate how markets naturally and organically operate. And it can purchase real goods and services with newly printed money, acquiring more and more for itself at the expense of those who don’t have the special privilege of printing money.

If money is printed on an ongoing basis, inflation becomes a culturally accepted norm. In modern society, ask anyone if they think prices will be higher next year and you’ll get only one answer: of course.

Inflation makes people poorer.
The daily expenses of those who do not receive newly printed money early in the inflation process tend, on average, to rise faster than incomes. Money printing may appear to increase the amount of activity in an economy, but stealthily it makes economic conditions more difficult – most people find themselves worse off than before. The higher the rate of money printing and inflation, the worse off people generally are. In short, inflation makes people poorer by stealing their purchasing power.

* * *

Geredigeerd citaat uit Pippa Malmgren (pags. 106-110; vet toegevoegd): Signals.

At the heart of the Eurozone lies a profound social contract problem.

The 2007/8 financial crisis revealed that spending was exceeding income by such a large amount that many European nations and financial institutions were illiquid: they could not meet their cash-flow requirements. In reality, they were more than illiquid. They were insolvent and needed a bailout.
Greece and Cyprus were forced to seek bailouts and to default on their debt. The European Union, with the backing of the International Monetary Fund, supported the Cypriot government when it chose to (or was forced to) take 47.5 per cent of its citizens’ private savings directly from some of their bank accounts to help fund the loss (accounts were eligible for the raid as long as there was more than €100,000 per person in the account). There can be few greater breaches of the social contract than when your government simply takes your money directly out of your bank.

There are those in Brussels and European capitals who believe that, unlike the old social contract which evolved around democracy, the new social contract in Europe may have to be imposed on the people.
According to these elites, the public cannot grasp that this is in their best interest. As things stand, bailing out most of the Eurozone will break the social contract in Germany and failing to do so will break the social contract in the periphery. Reconciling the two may not be possible.

 

*

nelpuntnl.nl/schulden-tsunamis-en-de-kanarie-in-de-mijn/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fake salaris- en nep-loonsverhogingen

 

Peter Schiff –  Democracies are as violent in their deaths as they are in their births.

*

> * >  geredigeerd citaat uit Peter Schiff: The Real Crash ; vet toegevoegd < * <  You cannot speak intelligently about the root causes of the 2008 crash—or about our current instability—without speaking about the Federal Reserve System of the United States (the Fed).
The Fed sets interest rates, it controls the money supply, it is effectively the main lender to the United States Government, and the lender of last resort to the banks, and it is the core of the Bush-Obama bailout machine. The Fed has always been quietly at the heart of the economy’s ups and downs, but since bailout mania began in March 2008 with the Fed’s bailout of Bear Stearns, there’s no ignoring it anymore.

And if you study all the facts, there’s also no ignoring that the Fed, rather than the agent of stability it was supposed to be, is an inflation machine and a facilitator of big government, creating bubbles, causing waste, and now, setting us up for an economic downturn that could be worse than the Great Depression.

So if we are to trace the recent economic troubles back to their roots, we need to start in 1913 with the creation of the Fed.

The original intention of the Fed was something I might have supported had I been around back then. In theory, it was an agent of stability that could also promote economic growth.

Today, the Fed increases the money supply when the economy grows, then expands it even faster as it contracts. Not only is this the exact opposite of what it was intended to do, but had such a harebrained scheme been proposed in the beginning, the Federal Reserve never would have seen the light of day.

The role of a central bank is limited: to control the currency so as to keep prices and interest rates fairly stable. Spurring job creation and achieving economic growth were not part of the mandate. Saving failed banks was certainly not part of the job. And the Fed’s main role today—propping up government spending with money made out of thin air—was certainly not part of the original pitch, because the Fed was at first prohibited from buying government debt.

This sort of central bank is one I could have supported. But the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States never functioned this way, and it probably was never meant to. However, for the same reason one should never allow the camel to get its nose under the tent, we never should have trusted the Fed to respect its boundaries.

Wars involve huge new costs to government. Governments can cover these wartime costs with cuts to domestic spending. They can also raise taxes, calling on a sense of common sacrifice. As a third option, governments can borrow, selling “war bonds” to investors. < * <

Bron: The Real Crash (2012 ) by Peter D. Schiff.   ISBN 978-1-25000835-0 (e-book)